Qt wiki will be updated on October 12th 2023 starting at 11:30 AM (EEST) and the maintenance will last around 2-3 hours. During the maintenance the site will be unavailable.

Code Review: Sharing the load

From Qt Wiki
Revision as of 15:32, 22 November 2019 by EdwardWelbourne (talk | contribs) (Nils Jeisecke's notes, via e-mail)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • Situation: Many reviews in queue for long time (forever?)
 * Android: They have a button: Find "Maintainers" (Plugin for Gerrit)
 * Thiago: Would solve the first 15 Minutes for Contributors, not enough
 * Improve the culture, appreciate the effort ("Thank you!")
 * Get more people on-board as reviewers (not as approvers yet)
 * Idea: Should not be +1 and +1, should be "Thumbs up" and "Tick!"
   * Some reviewers don't understand the implication of "+1" (two "+1" != "+2")
  • What does a good patch looks like?
* breaking patch up into multiple patches
* Is the documentation really good enough (opinions vary)
  • Ask contributors whose changes have just been review to review others (sometimes happens)
  • Gerrit
 * Sanity bot is good
 * Revive early warning bot!
   * Should changes only be approved after tests has run on CI?
   * Can we get a "small CI" run (just Linux, "does it build?")
   * Should the bot automatically run tests if tests have been changed?
   * Should the bot automatically give a warning if tests have not been added (excluding doc only changes)?
 * "Auto defer" bot is currently not active, would be useful to automatically
   defer patches where contributor did not response to requests.
 * Automatically stage when change is approved? Faster turnaround time.
 * Mail (monthly?) reports to maintainers (or others?) (based on gerrit dashboard config?): "N Changes approved, but not staged? Link to staging page", List per module?
 * Let's try it and see how it works out
  • Gerrit Features unused right now
 * Attach labels
 * Bot could apply hashtags ("wants adoption", "stage-me")
 * Has a feature to make clazy automatically appply improvements to the change ("contributor has to click a button")

  • Public Community Feedback does not exist
 * Alex: Use Thiago's script to highlight new contributions (Grafana?)? "Welcome new contributor!" for blog post (Like KDE does)?

---

Follow-up session extensions (lots of overlapping topics)

  • Give contributor feedback
 * Bot should say: "Welcome, Thanks for your first contribution"
 * Monthly blog post advertising external contributors?
 * Send out physical awards? T-Shirts, "Thank you" letter, ...?
  • Make contributing easier
 * Put contributor documentation into Qt's documentation ("Gettings started")?
 * Link freenode IRC Web-Backend to simplify access to IRC for new contributors
 * Use Qt account profile to setup everything needed for contributing (ssh keys, CLA check, ...)
 * Adapt github workflow (Checklist "Auto test done", "Documentation done", ...)
  • Triage bugs
 * Add Jira label ("for juniors")?
  • Community
 * Missing Community manager (Consent: Yes, it's needed)
 * Missing "qt-project" entity, kind of a foundation? Funding?
 * Redefine: What is the qt-project?
  • Activating new contributors
 * Communication of Qt (company) targets companies, not community (qt.org => qt.io => sales)
 * Microsoft pushes its stuff to universities, why not Qt (or qt-project?)
 * Qt project needs a proper homepage. With nice, contemporary Howtos, ...