Qt wiki will be updated on October 12th 2023 starting at 11:30 AM (EEST) and the maintenance will last around 2-3 hours. During the maintenance the site will be unavailable.
QtCS2018 Serialisation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with " * Serialisation * Binary JSON * mmapable() - zero alloc * deprecate, provide compat API to read * how to support reading from it? BJSON → J...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Serialisation == | |||
=== Binary JSON === | |||
* | * Was created for qtjsondb | ||
* fast reading | |||
* mmap()able | |||
* Deprecate soon (Qt 5.12?) | |||
** Remove from QJsonDocument in Qt 6 | |||
** Provide compat API to read | |||
*** BSJON → JSON → parse again | |||
=== QJsonDocument === | |||
foo["s"] = "value"; // does not compile | |||
foo. | * Limited to 128 MB of RAM footprint (due to Binary JSON) | ||
* Needs to be fixed before Qt 6 | |||
* Can use the same backend as QCborValue | |||
* Complaint: updating in-place is not easy | |||
** If you update an entry in a node, you have to update the chain leading to it | |||
** QCborValue has the same problem, as it was designed to have the same API | |||
QJsonValue foo = ...; | |||
foo["s"] = "value"; // does not compile | |||
foo.toObject()["s"] = "value"; // updates the temporary! | |||
// must write instead: | |||
QJsonObject fooObject = foo.toObject(); | |||
fooObject["s"] = "value"; | |||
setFoo(fooObject); | |||
=== Common DOM API? === | |||
* Should we have a common API for manipulating trees of JSON-like values? | |||
* QCborValue is a superset of QJsonValue | |||
** But it would be confusing to users to use CBOR classes to manipulate JSON | |||
** Generic name? | |||
* What other uses would this API have? | |||
** Replace QJSValue (QtQml)? | |||
** Replace QVariantMap? | |||
** Entry point for a Protobuf API? | |||
* How to make sure people can't insert combinations not allowed in the output? | |||
** For example, associative containers using integers as keys in JSON | |||
** Do they do that? Maybe they won't write such code | |||
*** They know what their content is used for | |||
** We could use templates, specialising for CBOR, JSON, etc. | |||
** We could have a wrapper class that has inlines and provides only the possible combinations | |||
* QCborValue integrated last Friday into QtCore 5.12 | |||
** Need to know in the next few weeks if we keep it for 5.12 | |||
** Can yank it out and move to a new module for Tech Preview | |||
=== Serialising Qt state === | |||
* Needed by Qt Remote Objects | |||
* Slightly different from CBOR and JSON purposes | |||
** Not about a standardised representation of a data model | |||
** More about transmitting state from two independent processes of the same application | |||
* Currently using QDataStream | |||
** Has a lot of problems, can't really detect errors and not extensible enough | |||
* Need more exploration, no conclusion | |||
=== Protobuf === | |||
* Need volunteers to write a Proof of Concept | |||
** plugin to protoc? |
Latest revision as of 11:15, 11 June 2018
Serialisation
Binary JSON
- Was created for qtjsondb
- fast reading
- mmap()able
- Deprecate soon (Qt 5.12?)
- Remove from QJsonDocument in Qt 6
- Provide compat API to read
- BSJON → JSON → parse again
QJsonDocument
- Limited to 128 MB of RAM footprint (due to Binary JSON)
- Needs to be fixed before Qt 6
- Can use the same backend as QCborValue
- Complaint: updating in-place is not easy
- If you update an entry in a node, you have to update the chain leading to it
- QCborValue has the same problem, as it was designed to have the same API
QJsonValue foo = ...; foo["s"] = "value"; // does not compile foo.toObject()["s"] = "value"; // updates the temporary! // must write instead: QJsonObject fooObject = foo.toObject(); fooObject["s"] = "value"; setFoo(fooObject);
Common DOM API?
- Should we have a common API for manipulating trees of JSON-like values?
- QCborValue is a superset of QJsonValue
- But it would be confusing to users to use CBOR classes to manipulate JSON
- Generic name?
- What other uses would this API have?
- Replace QJSValue (QtQml)?
- Replace QVariantMap?
- Entry point for a Protobuf API?
- How to make sure people can't insert combinations not allowed in the output?
- For example, associative containers using integers as keys in JSON
- Do they do that? Maybe they won't write such code
- They know what their content is used for
- We could use templates, specialising for CBOR, JSON, etc.
- We could have a wrapper class that has inlines and provides only the possible combinations
- QCborValue integrated last Friday into QtCore 5.12
- Need to know in the next few weeks if we keep it for 5.12
- Can yank it out and move to a new module for Tech Preview
Serialising Qt state
- Needed by Qt Remote Objects
- Slightly different from CBOR and JSON purposes
- Not about a standardised representation of a data model
- More about transmitting state from two independent processes of the same application
- Currently using QDataStream
- Has a lot of problems, can't really detect errors and not extensible enough
- Need more exploration, no conclusion
Protobuf
- Need volunteers to write a Proof of Concept
- plugin to protoc?