QtCS2017 QtCore

Intro

Suggested topics:

• hashing function update; expanding the hash seed to 64- or 128-bit; adding std::hash for Qt types
• QIODevice for Qt 6

Move to the containers session:

• use qssize_t

Quick conclusions:

• QRandomGenerator and providing a PRNG of good quality (Mersenne Twister or Chacha20)
  • Yes if our compilers support

Use of standard C++ API

We will not add compilers that are worse than what we have today.

• If all the compilers we have support things like std::mersenne_twister, then all will
• We can add hard-fail configure test
• Should we start migrating from QSharedPointer to std::shared_ptr?
  • Deprecate
  • Deprecate QScopedPointer
• What about API from C++17/20 that we'd like to use?
  • Try to backport the API into a QtPrivate namespace (if it's been standardised) unless we want to add significant functionality a la QStringView
  • If it's not standardised yet, use Qt-style naming
• API naming
  • std:: API naming is subtly different from Qt API (hopefully nothing that is confusing or misleading)
  • We could try to create wrappers (container.empty() → container.isEmpty())

Modifiers vs getters for QString/QStringView/QByteArray

We don't want people to write:

 str = std::move(str).simplified()

We want instead:

 str.simplify()

So we want to add the full set of modifiers.

Do we want to add freestanding functions that may operate on std::string and other string types?

• Like qSimplify()
• Polluting namespace
• They'd all need to be inline and some could be big
• freestanding brings in ADL and could introduce unexpected isues
• We think members are cleaner and we don't want to add these

• However, we already have some of those! qStartsWith
  • Global namespace *and* documented
  • foo.startsWith(bar) vs qStartsWith(foo, bar)
  • Same conclusion, probably mark \internal, namespace them
    • But review the changes to see what our arguments were on making them public

QStringView

• NEVER return QStringView (but QRegularExpression wants to)
  • Consequence of "never return a reference" (but containers do)
  • Lifetime issues

   auto s = lineedit.text().left(n);
   s valid?

• We can be flexible on having exceptions:
  • The API needs to be specifically designed for dealing with references
  • Clear naming, such as QRegularExpression::captureView()

Discussion not finished